Krause and the Niche Hypothesis

Some reading I’ve been doing recently has me thinking hard about the direction I want to take my research (and the blog) this year. I was recently introduced by a friend (whose work on wilding the city stresses the importance of green spaces in urban environments) to Bernard Krause, a pioneer of electronic synthesis turned acoustic ecologist who proposes an interesting addition to the canon of evolutionary outcomes.

Krause’s Niche Hypothesis suggests that species develop vocal characteristics that occupy bandwidths in specific regions of the frequency spectrum. This reduces the chance that their mating and warning calls will clash with those of other species, thereby increasing their chances of finding a mate and succesfully communicating coming dangers. In noisy environments animals find it harder to distinguish the noises of their own kind from those made by other species. In the worst case scenario, a species will become extinct due to an inability to successfully communicate with each other.

Many ecosystems have achieved a natural equilibrium from centuries of acoustic evolution. Krause has observed a balance range of animal frequencies in what we might consider some of the most cacophonous environments on the planet. After some eye-opening work in the Venezuelan rainforest, he sought to test his theory. By characterising and tracking individual species’ mating calls in similarly dense acoustic surroundings, he has graphed the way which this natural give and take works. A variety of unique sonic footprints can be seen working around each other in such a way that no one part of the frequency spectrum is ever too over-populated.

While his theory is still contested in scientific circles, it is gaining serious traction and Krause provides some compelling evidence to back it up. In subsequent posts I’ll explore in more detail his ideas as well as those of his detractors.

Advertisements

3 responses to “Krause and the Niche Hypothesis

  1. Interesting ideas you are looking at and I like how you are focusing in on the one guy. Juliet

  2. Pingback: Forest For the Trees «

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s